If voting could change the system, they would make it illegal. (Jamil
Al-Amin, aka H. Rap Brown)
Here are a few
arguments for those who insist on voting for the lesser of evils.
One of the first
things Black folks say is, “We fought and died for the right to vote.”
Yes, having fought
in every war beginning with the revolutionary war of independence from Britain,
we have always done the dying; we've always been on the front lines of struggle
in this country. SNCC, Fannie Lou Hamer, and all the valiant freedom
fighters of the civil rights movement are to be honored and revered for their
uncompromising fight for our right to vote.
However, after we won that particular battle in1965, the reactionaries in power initiated new ways to suppress and vacate our vote -- new rules and laws of disenfranchisement, such as denying prisoners and felons the vote, fraudulent registration procedures, vote tampering, rigged voting machines, new photo ID requirements, etc.
Eric Nielson writes that since 2010, 11 states have passed laws that make it more difficult to vote. Citing a report from The Sentencing Project, 5.85 million people are now barred from voting because of a felony conviction, about 2.5 percent of the total population. The principled position would be all of us or none or all for one and one for all.
The systematic disenfranchisement of Black voters in Florida, 2000, and elsewhere across the country validates the following statement:
"...the two
parties have combined against us to nullify our power by a 'gentlemen's
agreement' of non-recognition, no matter how we vote...May God write us down as
asses if ever again we are found putting our trust in either Republican or the
Democratic parties." (W.E.B. DuBois)
Moreover, the
recent Citizens United Supreme Court decision making corporations persons and
unleashing unlimited sums to campaign financing corrupts the voting process
with media madness and chicanery. It’s been projected that this
presidential campaign will ultimately cost nearly $11 billion.
“All political parties, as things stand, will support the power complex. Any individual elected will either be a supporter of the established politics -- or an 'individual.' [Such as Ralph Nader] What would help us, in fact, is to allow as many right-wing elements as possible to assume 'political' power...The fascists already have power. The point is that some way must be found to expose them and combat them. An electoral choice of ten different fascists is like choosing which way one wishes to die. The holder of so-called high public office is always merely an extension of the hated ruling corporate class [the 1%]. It is to our benefit that this person be openly hostile, despotic, unreasoning. We are not living in a nation where left-wing parties hold eighty out of two hundred seats in a congressional body....This is a huge nation dominated by the most reactionary and violent ruling class in the history of the world, where the majority of the people just simply cannot understand that they are existing on the misery and discomfort of the world." (George Jackson, Blood In My Eye)
In fact, we Americans are hated more and
more as this President targets innocent civilians with drones and kill lists
for massacres and assassinations, supports fascist dictatorships, perpetrates imperialist wars (Iraq, Afghanistan) and military
occupations (such as the Zionist occupation of Palestine), and escalating
militarism across the globe in his aggressive pillaging of global resources.
We are hated because we claim to elect these
imperialist warmongers and thus bear responsibility for their ongoing
atrocities against other peoples in other sovereign nations.
“When any election
is held it will fortify rather than destroy the credibility of the power
brokers. When we participate in this election to win, instead of disrupt,
we’re lending to its credibility and destroying our own. With all the
factors of control over the electoral process in the hands of the minority
ruling class, the people’s party can always be made to seem isolated,
unimportant, even extraneous. If these tactics [and voting is just that,
a tactic] still give the appearance of revolution to some after decades of
miscarriage, we are justified in replacing them as vanguard.”(Jackson,
Blood In My Eye)
In this case, or currently, “vanguard” should indicate a new revolutionary people’s party and platform NOT plugged into the system or trying to win a seat at the table-- or a united front of like-minded organizations/parties.
Finally, we don’t have a
one-person-one-vote electoral process. The Framers opted for a
complex system of delegates called the Electoral College. Each
state would have a number of electors equal to their Representatives in the
House plus their two Senators. Whoever wins the most votes in the state
gets all the electoral votes. This provided for a winner-take-all ballot in
which voters cast their ballots for the candidate of their choice
indirectly. I.e., they are really signaling their choice to a slew of
delegates who in turn are supposed to honor the popular vote in the final
plebiscite a month later at the Electoral College. This process literally
discards all the "losing" votes in each and every state, giving more
power to the small states and putting a check on the power of the majority. And
rest assured that people of color are the current majority.
For example, in Wyoming, it takes 167,000 votes
to gain a single electoral vote; in California, it takes at least 645,000 to
get one electoral vote, giving the Wyoming voter four times the voting power of
Californians. Then, let’s say one million voters in California split
their votes between the two candidates at 49% to 51%. The 49%, or close
to a half million votes would be discounted. Repeat this process in 50
states and the number of votes discarded is mindboggling. Yet we
continually hear the propaganda that “Every vote counts!” Nothing could
be further from the truth. In fact, four presidents were elected after losing
the popular vote.
You must have noticed that neither
candidate, Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney, spent time courting votes in the
largest cities (New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, etc.). Instead, they
campaigned furiously in small, so-called “swing states” with predominately
White populations to win the crucial electoral votes. It’s clear that
centuries of racial segregation, regional redistricting and poll maneuvering,
especially the primaries, has rendered the smallest, Whitest states the most
critical to Presidential candidates, presenting illusory photo ops for visual
consumption on national TV fortifying the illusion of a predominately White,
conservative electorate.
In a kind of extension of the 3/5 of person
adjudication by the Framers, the predominately urban Black/Brown prisoners are
inflating the rural white populations leaving the urban areas underrepresented.
Since in most states no law binds the
electors to honor the people's vote, the elector is free to vote for whomever
he or she chooses. Thus, it's easy to see that this undemocratic
electoral process lends itself readily to fraud, manipulation, and
corruption. A number of polls found at least 70% of the American population
favors abolishing the Electoral College. I think that percentage would be 99%
if all eligible voters clearly understood it.
As for myself, I simply cannot be FOR what
I’m AGAINST. I cannot in good conscience vote for a fascist, for
evil. That’s my bottom line.
However, I will work to help organize our
people, especially poor people, around their basic human needs: clean water,
healthy food, decent housing, free quality education, health care, and child
care while fighting warmongering foreign policy and the divisive negatives that
preclude unity -- racism, classism, sexism, and homophobia. I'll fight for true rehabilitation and abolition of the prison system and the death penalty.
In the effort to become the new woman, I’ll work on my own flaws and isms in the process of making revolution. I hope you’ll do the same. Believe me, it’s a lot harder than casting a vote and will produce tangible, positive results, instead of more of the same only worse.
In the effort to become the new woman, I’ll work on my own flaws and isms in the process of making revolution. I hope you’ll do the same. Believe me, it’s a lot harder than casting a vote and will produce tangible, positive results, instead of more of the same only worse.
Think outside the box. Dare to
struggle; dare to win!
No comments:
Post a Comment